Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: CBC Latch contention in 10g
I don't know if there is any published material on this - I think I got the important bit of it from Steve Adams' masterclass.
It's likely that the sharable cache latch used some of the time is better than never having it at all - and Oracle does keep finding new ways to (a) reduce the latch acquisition, and (b) switch to single latch reads anyway, so scalability does keep improving.
Where did you see a fanfare about sharable latches, I didn't spot it. I'd be interested to see how it was presented.
Regards
Jonathan Lewis
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html Optimising Oracle Seminar - schedule updated Sept 19th
: Thanks Jonathan. You've given me something to think about. It had not
: occurred to me that the buffer header would have to be modified in order
: inspect the buffer for consistent read purposes and that the CBC latch
would
: not be taken in a sharable mode. This puts some rather severe limitations
: on CBC latch sharing and makes me wonder why Oracle bothered to implement
: it. It would also seem to place some severe limits on scalability even in
: read-only environments. CBC latch sharing was announced with some
fanfare,
: so I had expected it to be of more consequence.
:
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Thu Oct 21 2004 - 11:33:50 CDT
![]() |
![]() |