Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: CBC Latch contention in 10g
Perhaps fanfare was too strong a word. I was greatly encouraged by what I
read about CBC latch sharing for reads in Cary's "Why You Should Focus on
LIOs Instead of PIOs" and Richmond's "Oracle Wait Interface:..."
Regards,
John Smiley
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]
On Behalf Of Jonathan Lewis
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 11:38 AM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: CBC Latch contention in 10g
I don't know if there is any published material on this - I think I got the important bit of it from Steve Adams' masterclass.
It's likely that the sharable cache latch used some of the time is better than never having it at all - and Oracle does keep finding new ways to (a) reduce the latch acquisition, and (b) switch to single latch reads anyway, so scalability does keep improving.
Where did you see a fanfare about sharable latches, I didn't spot it. I'd be interested to see how it was presented.
Regards
Jonathan Lewis
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html Optimising Oracle Seminar - schedule updated Sept 19th
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Thu Oct 21 2004 - 13:22:27 CDT
![]() |
![]() |