Re: SAP Reorgs

From: Mogens Nørgaard <mln_at_miracleas.dk>
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 06:09:26 +0200
Message-ID: <40D50DF6.3080902@miracleas.dk>

If a reorg has to be done, there's a much more basic way of accomplishing the goal than all these discussions seem to indicate.

See http://www.datadocktorn.nu/us_frag1.php which Michael Möller of Miracle found yesterday.

No fun without risc
When you reorg your disc

Mogens

Tim Gorman wrote:
> I¹m kind of confused about why there is any discussion about this topic...
> Reorgs are bad, bad, bad. You need downtime to accomplish them, else a
> non-trivial amount of preparation and cleverness (or an expensive 3rd-party
> product) to avoid that downtime. As someone remarked earlier in this
> thread, we wouldn¹t be having a discussion on reorgs if they were painless.
> But they are painful (by varying degrees), so it is prudent to quantify the
> benefits before expending the effort and incurring the risk, right? They
> certainly do not fall into the realm of ³best practice², I think we can
> agree?
>

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.

--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Sat Jun 19 2004 - 23:06:36 CDT