Re: system statistics in 10g

From: Jonathan Lewis <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 23:58:30 +0100
Message-ID: <004c01c45587$c6579130$7102a8c0@Primary>

You mean dbms_schedule is clearly the better choice because DBCA is using dbms_job ?
I hadn't considered the double-bluff as a design strategy, but I see what you mean.

Regards

Jonathan Lewis

http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk

http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ

http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html Optimising Oracle Seminar - schedule updated May 1st

• Original Message ----- From: "Mark W. Farnham" <mwf_at_rsiz.com> To: <oracle-l_at_freelists.org> Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 11:35 PM Subject: RE: system statistics in 10g

Now, now, JL, you've confused me. Is the use of one or the other by DBCA indication of the choice reflecting "better" or "worse?"

Anyway, I thought that the choice of tools in Oracle products reflected one product area manager owing another product area manager a favor and tortuous computations regarding the internal compensation model.

;)

mwf

---

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

---

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--

Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html

---

Received on Fri Jun 18 2004 - 17:55:14 CDT