Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> strange behavior in 9.2.0.4 - no blocks in keep buffer pool for table

strange behavior in 9.2.0.4 - no blocks in keep buffer pool for table

From: Paul Drake <discgolfdba_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:17:28 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20040609181728.81459.qmail@web20411.mail.yahoo.com>


unexpected behavior in 9.2.
blocks are not appearing for a table in v$bh. at all.
not via a table scan, not via index access.

I don't see any of this table's blocks in v$bh in production, either.

testing environment
9.2.0.4 on w2k adv svr sp4 /3GB
4 GB physical memory
sga max size set to 2.5 GB

db_block_size=8KB
db_cache_size=1.5 GB
db_keep_size=.5 GB

test heap table has 46246 blocks (363 MB).

alter table <table_name> storage (buffer pool keep); alter table <table_name> cache;

bounced database instance.

select distinct <column_name> from <table_name> where pk_id in ( ... list of 10 values ... );

verified that table access is via index.

still no blocks appear in v$bh, x$bh or the views that Jonathan published here:

http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/pin_table.html

has anyone seen this, did I miss something? I'll admit that since we went from 7.3.4 to 8.1.6, I stopped using the keep pool and marking tables as "CACHE". There is one table that is getting hammered, that I would very much like to cache.

thanks in advance.

Paul                          



Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. http://messenger.yahoo.com/

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--

Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
Received on Wed Jun 09 2004 - 13:14:52 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US