Re: Oracle 9.2 changes in INIT

From: Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 22:03:26 +0100
Message-ID: <7765c89704060814032782617b@mail.gmail.com>

Yes it was. It isn't what it says though. I did log an iTar and it was accepted as a documentation bug in the end - initially they told me to use maxextents unlimited :(. The docs are revised in 10g. This is how it is supposed to work, and hey it did.

--
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
http://www.niall.litchfield.dial.pipex.com

Original Message ----- From: Jacques Kilchoer <jacques.kilchoer_at_quest.com> Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 11:09:18 -0700 Subject: RE: Oracle 9.2 changes in INIT To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org

Weren't those numbers the maximum number of extents for a segment in 7.1 (before unlimited extents)?

Table 7-6 Maximum Number of Extents for Each Database

Typical Block Sizes Number of Extents

 2 KB                       121
 4 KB                       255
 8 KB                       504
16 KB                      1032
32 KB                      2070

________________________________

Jared.Still_at_radisys.com

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--

Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html

Received on Tue Jun 08 2004 - 16:00:31 CDT