Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: V$OBJECT_USAGE view for indexes in all schemas

RE: V$OBJECT_USAGE view for indexes in all schemas

From: Jesse, Rich <Rich.Jesse_at_quadtechworld.com>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 12:15:12 -0500
Message-ID: <FBE1FCA40ECAD41180400050DA2BC54004E93997@qtiexch2.qgraph.com>


Thanks, Boris! Your bug is so new the Support analyst didn't find it = until I redirected him to it (save the comments -- I'm giving him the = benefit of the doubt). For now, I've created a "QT_INDEX_USAGE" view in = SYS that incorporates all schemas, unlike the Oracle-supplied = V$OBJECT_USAGE fixed view. I'm not terribly comfortable with the idea = of creating user objects in SYS for a production system, but at least = the recommendation for it is in the TAR as well as another MetaLink = article, so my CYA is in place.

Working a TAR with the help of this list makes a big difference! :)

Thanks again!
Rich

Rich Jesse                        System/Database Administrator
rich.jesse_at_quadtechworld.com      QuadTech, Sussex, WI USA


> -----Original Message-----
> From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 7:50 AM
> Subject: Re: V$OBJECT_USAGE view for indexes in all schemas

>=20
>=20

> Worked just fine for us before 9.2.0.5
>=20

> In 9.2.0.5 "grant select on sys.object_usage to ... "
> for the first time raises ORA-701 and subsequent
> grants throw ORA-600 [17058]
>=20

> Support opened bug 3627650 for us, which apparently
> (as in not confirmed yet) can be fixed with the
> one-off patch for bug 2934068
>=20

> Thanks,
> Boris Dali.


Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tue May 18 2004 - 12:14:28 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US