Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: RE: anyone ever use sub-partitioning?
yes and 95% of the data we don't need. Not allowed to get rid of it, because its too close to our release date, wasn't allowed to work on the ETL process until the last minute, so I'm in a bind. :(. We could shrink many of these tables down by about 90% if we dumped the unneeded data. There are 208 columns in one and we need like 8 of them.
not that I'm complaining or anything.
>
> From: "Khedr, Waleed" <Waleed.Khedr_at_FMR.COM>
> Date: 2004/04/30 Fri AM 10:31:49 EDT
> To: <oracle-l_at_freelists.org>
> Subject: RE: anyone ever use sub-partitioning?
>
> So you have average row size =3D 1 ?
>
-- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------Received on Fri Apr 30 2004 - 10:09:53 CDT
![]() |
![]() |