Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: RE: anyone ever use sub-partitioning?

Re: RE: anyone ever use sub-partitioning?

From: <ryan.gaffuri_at_cox.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 11:12:07 -0400
Message-Id: <20040430151205.BMXX5659.lakermmtao09.cox.net@smtp.central.cox.net>


yes and 95% of the data we don't need. Not allowed to get rid of it, because its too close to our release date, wasn't allowed to work on the ETL process until the last minute, so I'm in a bind. :(. We could shrink many of these tables down by about 90% if we dumped the unneeded data. There are 208 columns in one and we need like 8 of them.

not that I'm complaining or anything.
>
> From: "Khedr, Waleed" <Waleed.Khedr_at_FMR.COM>
> Date: 2004/04/30 Fri AM 10:31:49 EDT
> To: <oracle-l_at_freelists.org>
> Subject: RE: anyone ever use sub-partitioning?
>
> So you have average row size =3D 1 ?
>



Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Fri Apr 30 2004 - 10:09:53 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US