Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: 9i - ASSM
"Oracle features are like fine wines - they should be allowed to mature for a few years before you try them"
(Tom Kyte - re-interpreting the commonest reason he had heard for people avoiding new features).
On this one, my sympathies lie with your senior DBA.
On the other hand, ASSM is clearly the strategic direction for Oracle - so at some stage you'll have to go with the flow. You could compromise - by testing in production - design you tablespace strategy with a view to being able to move objects from freelist to assm (and back again) with minimum pain, a few at a time.
Regards
Jonathan Lewis
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk
The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html
March 2004 Hotsos Symposium - The Burden of Proof
Dynamic Sampling - an investigation
March 2004 Charlotte OUG (www.cltoug.org) CBO Tutorial
April 2004 Iceland
June 2004 UK - Optimising Oracle Seminar
: We are having a debate on building tablespaces with automatic segment
space
: management (ASSM). This is a 9i db on a Solaris box. I'm in favor of using
: ASSM but the senior dba is a bit hesitant and want to put in manual mode.
: I've even tried to persuade him with the Oracle documentation but he
insists
: its not mature enough for production.
:
: Is there any white papers or matalink papers that show the pros and cons
to
: ASSM in 9i? Has anyone had issues with using ASSM? Is there a way of
proving
: ASSM is better than MSSM?
:
: Thanks,
:
: Mark
:
-- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------Received on Fri Mar 05 2004 - 02:30:22 CST
![]() |
![]() |