and the indexing is bad. I just got pointed to the wrong page. Its not off by much(1-2 pagges), but still very annoying. I guess when you have the only 9i OCP upgrade book on the market, you do not have to worry about competition... (btw, it should be good enough for me to pass the exam, but Robert Freeman's new features book is much better).
>
> From: <ryan.gaffuri_at_cox.net>
> Date: 2004/03/01 Mon AM 08:02:10 EST
> To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
> Subject: Re: Re: Hash Partitioning
>
> no its a 9.0 upgrade book and no mention of hash partitioning of IOTs. There are alot of grammar errors in the book so a mistake like this doesn't surprise me. anyone use the oracle press 9i upgrade book? It reads ok, its just not edited well at all.
> >
> > From: "Jonathan Lewis" <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk>
> > Date: 2004/03/01 Mon AM 03:21:00 EST
> > To: <oracle-l_at_freelists.org>
> > Subject: Re: Hash Partitioning
> >
> >
> > Perhaps the author is thinking of hash-partitioning
> > of index organized tables - which I think appeared
> > only in 9.2
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Jonathan Lewis
> > http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk
> >
> > The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ
> > http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html
> >
> > March 2004 Hotsos Symposium - The Burden of Proof
> > Dynamic Sampling - an investigation
> > March 2004 Charlotte OUG (www.cltoug.org) CBO Tutorial
> > April 2004 Iceland
> > June 2004 UK - Optimising Oracle Seminar
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Ryan" <ryan.gaffuri_at_cox.net>
> > To: <oracle-l_at_freelists.org>
> > Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 2:45 AM
> > Subject: Hash Partitioning
> >
> >
> > I'm studying for the 9i OCP upgrade and my book says that Hash Parititioning
> > was introduced in 9i? Is this correct? I could have swarn it was 8.0?
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org
> > put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
> > --
> > Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
> > FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org
> put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
> --
> Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
> FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ:
http://www.orafaq.com
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Mon Mar 01 2004 - 07:07:20 CST
