no its a 9.0 upgrade book and no mention of hash partitioning of IOTs. There are alot of grammar errors in the book so a mistake like this doesn't surprise me. anyone use the oracle press 9i upgrade book? It reads ok, its just not edited well at all.
>
> From: "Jonathan Lewis" <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk>
> Date: 2004/03/01 Mon AM 03:21:00 EST
> To: <oracle-l_at_freelists.org>
> Subject: Re: Hash Partitioning
>
>
> Perhaps the author is thinking of hash-partitioning
> of index organized tables - which I think appeared
> only in 9.2
>
> Regards
>
> Jonathan Lewis
> http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk
>
> The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ
> http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html
>
> March 2004 Hotsos Symposium - The Burden of Proof
> Dynamic Sampling - an investigation
> March 2004 Charlotte OUG (www.cltoug.org) CBO Tutorial
> April 2004 Iceland
> June 2004 UK - Optimising Oracle Seminar
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ryan" <ryan.gaffuri_at_cox.net>
> To: <oracle-l_at_freelists.org>
> Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 2:45 AM
> Subject: Hash Partitioning
>
>
> I'm studying for the 9i OCP upgrade and my book says that Hash Parititioning
> was introduced in 9i? Is this correct? I could have swarn it was 8.0?
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org
> put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
> --
> Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
> FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ:
http://www.orafaq.com
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Mon Mar 01 2004 - 06:58:58 CST
