Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Emacs on SQLPlus, er uh... SQLPlus on emacs.
I agree with the developer vs. sysadmin generalization but this was not
meant to be a post about favorite editors... It's about whether anyone
has used or seen a SQLPlus "shell" running under emacs. Has anyone
"witnessed" SQLPlus running under a well-configured emacs session and
have impressions to share?
The statistics I've heard are that 9 out of 10 SysAdmin/DBA's use vi. I wonder what the breakdown is for Linux admins? Since emacs is easy to implement I could see it gaining ground on Linux but sometimes old dinosaur type SysAdmins are slow to evolve. :-)
Steve Orr-asaurus, with apologies to Don G.
-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Zito [mailto:mzito_at_gridapp.com]
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 2:24 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: Emacs on SQLPlus, er uh... SQLPlus on emacs.
<massive generalization>
It seems like DBAs that use Emacs over vi (emacs vs. vi being the classic UNIX holy war) tend to be people who were introduced to UNIX by being either a developer or an end-user. If a DBA favors vi over emacs, it seems that they generally come from a sysadmin background. That's how I ended up a vi user - none of the systems I was ever working on could be counted to have any editor OTHER than vi. For better or worse, its the ubiquitous UNIX text editor.
</massive generalization>
Of course, there are those who use notepad + ftp........
Matt
-- Matthew Zito GridApp Systems Email: mzito_at_gridapp.com Cell: 646-220-3551 Phone: 212-358-8211 x 359 http://www.gridapp.comReceived on Fri Jul 25 2003 - 17:20:49 CDT
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ml-errors_at_fatcity.com [mailto:ml-errors_at_fatcity.com] On Behalf
> Of Orr, Steve
> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 3:10 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: Emacs on SQLPlus, er uh... SQLPlus on emacs.
>
>
> vi is what I use and it's the predominant editor for SysAdmin/DBA
> types but I'm curious as to how many DBA's use emacs. I just saw a
> demo of SQL*Plus running under emacs and it was quite functional...
> Sorta like and IDE for SQL without Windoze GUI dependencies. Any DBA's
> use emacs on a daily basis?
![]() |
![]() |