Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Nasty bug in 9.2.0.1 (was: Oracle and Cache Hit Ratio based t
Good idea. We're having an Oracle rep coming to our company to talk up all
the advantages of 9i and I certainly intend to raise this issue.
Thank you Alexander for bringing it to our attention.
Jay Miller
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:34 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
train
You should call your sales persons and start applying pressure for them to
provide a correction to 9ir2.
I am doing this right now.
Yechiel Adar
Mehish
FWIW There is a document (id 283852) on Metalink updated on 03-SEP-2002 created by "CENTER OF EXPERTISE" named
THE COE PERFORMANCE METHOD
A PERFORMANCE METHODOLOGY FOR ENTERPRISE-WIDE INFORMATION SYSTEMS
which shows that Oracle Corporation turned from "ratio" to "wait interface"
approach.
The bad news is that in version 9.2.0.1 view V$SESSION_EVENT broken (bug 2429929), also described in Notes 208066.1. Bug fixed in 10i.
This bug affects OEM, BSTAT/ESTAT, STATSPACK, etc.
Did anybody adjust scripts which join V$SESSION with V$SESSION_EVENT? Should we use something like s.sid=e.sid+1 or s.sid-1=e.sid?
Alex.
-----Original Message-----
<mailto:Michael.Johnson_at_oln-afmc.af.mil> ]
Looks like Cache Hit Ratios may finally go away !!!
-- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: Miller, Jay INET: JayMiller_at_TDWaterhouse.com Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists -------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).Received on Fri Sep 13 2002 - 10:03:19 CDT
![]() |
![]() |