Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: how to force the DB to SKIP tx recovery ?
Vikas, even if the parameters were set for the checkpoint to happen often,
all the
transactions *not* commited would still be rolled back !! for example, when
i shut down the PC
in the middle of doing an update of 1/2 a million rows !!! (how would these
parameters help?)
> ----------
> From: Vikas Khanna[SMTP:vkhanna_at_quark.co.in]
>
> No, Instance recovery has to take place internally, SMON has to recover
> the
> committed transactions which were left hanging in the cache to datafiles
> so
> that the files become synchronized.
>
> After that the db gets opened and roll backwards takes its own time. It
> depends SMON does this job in the background and any other Server process
> if
> needs that block can rollback the uncommitted transaction and proceed with
> the block.
>
> If you wish to recover the instance recovery very fast then set the
> LOG_CHECKPOINT_INTERVAL,LOG_CHECKPOINT_TIMEOUT,FAST_START_IO_TARGET
> parameters to force the checkpoints quite often, this would open the
> instance under crash quite fast as it has to perform less work. But more
> the
> checkpoints initiated more the performance degradations as B'ground
> processes would be under tremendous work.
>
> Hope it clarifies.
> Vikas Khanna
>
-- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: Rahul INET: rahul_at_ratelindo.co.id Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists -------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).Received on Tue Jul 23 2002 - 04:43:28 CDT
![]() |
![]() |