Oracle-L: RE: LOG_BUFFER Parameter Question

From: Gogala, Mladen <MGogala_at_oxhp.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 10:12:22 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.0044E31C.20020424101222@fatcity.com>

Alternatively, you size it until redo_log_space_wait goes away from v$system_events.

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 4:59 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

Yep,

wrong tree. size it like: redo blocks per tx * tx/sec * 3/2 *<physical blocksize>

Anjo.

Denham Eva wrote:

Hello,

I have been wondering about how to work out what the optimal LOG_BUFFER parameter,
compared to the physical size of the REDOLOG file, for the best optimization and writes from buffer to log.
Or am I barking up the wrong tree? Is there some other way of doing this.

i.e. redolog file size is 10M and LOG_BUFFER is 512000. Can this be optimized better?

Denham Eva
Oracle DBA
In UNIX Land
On a quiet Night, you can hear the Windows machines reboot.

This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared by MailMarshal - For more information please visit www.marshalsoftware.com <http://www.marshalsoftware.com>

--

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--

Author: Gogala, Mladen
INET: MGogala_at_oxhp.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). Received on Wed Apr 24 2002 - 13:12:22 CDT