Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: LOG_BUFFER Parameter Question
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 10:12:22AM -0800, Gogala, Mladen wrote:
> Alternatively, you size it until redo_log_space_wait goes away from
> v$system_events.
it is v$system_event
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 4:59 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
>
>
> Yep,
>
> wrong tree. size it like: redo blocks per tx * tx/sec * 3/2 *<physical
> blocksize>
>
>
> Anjo.
>
>
>
> Denham Eva wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
> I have been wondering about how to work out what the optimal LOG_BUFFER
> parameter,
> compared to the physical size of the REDOLOG file, for the best optimization
> and writes from buffer to log.
> Or am I barking up the wrong tree? Is there some other way of doing this.
>
>
> i.e. redolog file size is 10M and LOG_BUFFER is 512000.
> Can this be optimized better?
>
>
> Denham Eva
> Oracle DBA
> In UNIX Land
> On a quiet Night, you can hear the Windows machines reboot.
>
>
> _____
>
> This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared by
> MailMarshal - For more information please visit www.marshalsoftware.com
> <http://www.marshalsoftware.com>
> _____
>
>
-- =============================================================== Ray Stell stellr_at_vt.edu (540) 231-4109 KE4TJC 28^D -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: Ray Stell INET: stellr_at_cns.vt.edu Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists -------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).Received on Wed Apr 24 2002 - 13:37:36 CDT
![]() |
![]() |