Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: # of datafiles per tablespace
Do you know of a web site where I could research particular thought
on? I have not seen anything like that in my research. Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
rabbit_at_emirates.net.ae
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 8:53 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
In a UNIX system it is better to have more small size datafiles than a few or one large datafile: The reason is that UNIX aquires an exclusive file write lock and therefore if you use multiple files you will avoid a situation where multiple simultaneous writes to data files become serialized and consequently reduce I/O performance: For example instead of one 2GB Data file , split it into 8 250mb: By the way I am addressing OLTP type systems with this e-mail
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author:
INET: rabbit_at_emirates.net.ae
Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists --------------------------------------------------------------------To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists --------------------------------------------------------------------To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). Received on Tue Mar 05 2002 - 07:48:25 CST
![]() |
![]() |