Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Data Dictionary Wierdness

RE: Data Dictionary Wierdness

From: Mercadante, Thomas F <NDATFM_at_labor.state.ny.us>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 05:34:10 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.003E960C.20020108051017@fatcity.com>

If my
memory serves me correctly, didn't this value used to be 'CACHE' and NULL?  That would explain the 5 char length.  Anybody have 805 available to test it?
 
Tom Mercadante <FONT face=Arial
size=2>Oracle Certified Professional

  <FONT face=Tahoma
  size=2>-----Original Message-----From: Jacques Kilchoer   [mailto:Jacques.Kilchoer_at_quest.com]Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002   7:35 PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject:   RE: Data Dictionary Wierdness
  Maybe some of the database engine source code is written in   COBOL and needs those blank spaces at the beginning for an accurate   comparison? Or are you calling achaudhr a chowderhead?  :-)   If it's any consolation, DBA_LOBS.CACHE is 'YES' or   'NO'.
> -----Original Message----- >

  From: Orr, Steve [<A
  href="mailto:sorr_at_rightnow.com">mailto:sorr_at_rightnow.com] <FONT   size=2>> Sent: lundi, 7. janvier 2002 15:55 >   To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L > Subject:   RE: Data Dictionary Wierdness > <FONT   size=2>> > Yeah I saw that after I sent the   email but it's still dumb > IMHO. We can
> either blame achaudhr or his/her boss.  :-) 
> > More text from

  catalog.sql: > Rem  achaudhr 10/25/95 - PTI:   Add lpads around degree, > instances, cache    Received on Tue Jan 08 2002 - 07:34:10 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US