Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: why is there dinosaur statues and evolution of human concious
I've said it before and I'll say it again.
Eric, you have entirely too much free time on your hands. ;)
- Larry Wall (creator of Perl)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric D. Pierce [mailto:PierceED_at_csus.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 5:00 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: why is there dinosaur statues and evolution of human
> conciousness / RE: OT : Sinclair was RE: Metalink Again
>
>
>
> On 5 Apr 2001, at 11:01, David Messer wrote:
>
> Date sent: Thu, 05 Apr 2001 11:01:26 -0800
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> <ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com>
>
> > But, Eric, I'm not out to prove anything.
>
> Never said you were.
>
> By "proof" I meant when two competing pieces of "factual" information
> (or references to such) are posted to a public list, then questions
> can, and perhaps ought to, be raised as to the veracity/legitimacy of
> the sources of the information, and the nature of the "truth claims"
> represented by the different perspectives in the argument.
>
>
> >I'm only trying to show Gates in
> > the worst light possible. My desire to do so derives from
> working day in
> > and day out with Microsoft products.
>
>
> I'm not exactly a fan of Gates/MS, and don't consider myself in
> opposition to your main point, but I would suggest that if one has to
> lie, deceive, or misrepresent in order to make the point, then one is
> potentially exposing oneself to valid criticisms about a lack of
> ethical consistency, and beyond that, the general efficacy of such
> tactics.
>
> For background on tendencies toward dysfunctional (self-defeating)
> nature of "social change" paradigms (and related tendencies toward
> ideological/political oppositionality), I would suggest reading Rabbi
> Michael Lerner's book "Surplus Powerlessness" (related commentary at
> http://www.tikkun.org/).
>
> As I've said before, I think the sociological backdrop to the debate
> about MS has to do with the conflicts in the value systems and "world
> views" of:
>
>
> 1) the (old time) industrial strength technical/engineering "purists"
> 2) the "populists", unfortunately including Gates, that weren't > afraid to do the messy job involved in taking the technology to > the masses (cheaply).
> INET: PierceED_at_csus.edu
![]() |
![]() |