Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Tables and indexes on different disks
That argument is incorrect, but then again, so is the argument that they must be separated.
(IMHO) What really matters is having a good grasp of what I/O is happening on your db and spreading the I/O accordingly.
For example, for nested loop type of access, the table/index separation will probably give a gain. For a sort merge, then separating the tables involved is more important (since the indexes in this case may not be used at all).
Then throw in index fast full scans, hash joins, parallel slaves et al and things get all the more complicated.
I think the *intentions* behind all the tuning doco we all typically see is valid - namely, try to control and balance your I/O.
Cheers
Connor
"Some days you're the pigeon, some days you're the statue"
-- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: =?iso-8859-1?q?Connor=20McDonald?= INET: hamcdc_at_yahoo.co.uk Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists -------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).Received on Tue Mar 13 2001 - 11:31:53 CST
![]() |
![]() |