Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: MTS vs. Dedicated connection
Maybe someone has managed to make it work, but during my Oracle 8i =
Upgrade
course the instructor mentioned that he never managed to make MTS work =
in
Oracle7, and in 8i he couldn't make it work either.
I installed 8.1.6. on a test server here, I spent about a day trying to
connect to it remotely, finally I put (server=3Ddedicated) in my =
tnsnames.ora
file and surprise, all the problems went away. I am almost using the =
very
same configuration that we are using for Oracle7, except for the
listener.ora file where SID has been replaced by SERVICE_NAME.
During that day I tried to understand the info on how to configure MTS =
for
8i, but the examples never seemed to quite fit my situation - which is =
very
simple: I want my users to be able to connect, and I want to be able =
to use
MTS server-side. We are using TCP/IP, and my test server here is an NT
machine. If connection pooling and multiplexing works, all the better, =
but
after a day of tweaking those .ora files the ability for clients to =
connect
became a lot more important than those other improvements to MTS.
If someone has managed to make MTS work properly in 8.1.6, I would like =
to
hear about that.
Regards,
Patrice Boivin
Systems Analyst (Oracle Certified DBA)
Systems Admin & Operations | Admin. et Exploit. des syst=E8mes Technology Services | Services technologiques Informatics Branch | Direction de l'informatique=20 Maritimes Region, DFO | R=E9gion des Maritimes, MPO
E-Mail: boivinp_at_mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca <mailto:boivinp_at_mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca>=20
-----Original Message----- From: Nikunj Gupta [SMTP:good_dba_at_hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 2:15 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: Re: MTS vs. Dedicated connection Does that mean even after configuring MTS .. the connection should be dedicated ? Can anyone highlight the benefits of MTS with Shared Connection / MTS with Dedicated Connection and simple dedicated connected without MTS. What would be the best situation to configure MTS. (Only more numbers of users with less I/O to server etc.) TIA Nikunj ----- Original Message ----- To: "Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L" <ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 02:07 PMReceived on Thu Jan 11 2001 - 08:06:39 CST
> Once again I solved a SQL*net performance problem where data was
being SELECTed
> via a DB_LINK from a remote system and being INSERTed into the
local instance.
>
> The original code was going into the remote host via MTS and was
taking 3+ hours
> to complete. By simply changing from @PROD (via MTS) to @PROD_DED
(via dedicated
> listener) the run time was reduced to about 4 MINUTES! This was
the ONLY change.
>
> HTH & YMMV!
> --
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
> --
> Author: Charlie Mengler
> INET: charliem_at_mwh.com
>
> Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858)
538-5051
> San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing
Lists
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
> To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
> to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and
in
> the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
> (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You
may
> also send the HELP command for other information (like
subscribing).
>
--=20 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com --=20 Author: Nikunj Gupta INET: good_dba_at_hotmail.com Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists -------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
![]() |
![]() |