Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: OPS questions
I had done some research on the various of HA options. From the reviews and experiences of other companies who have implemented OPS. 1. The OPS architecture is implemented on the expensive Hardware Cluster that has to be purchased from the HW vendor. A cost factor involved here. 2. OPS is a specialized skill that need the expertise of a Senior DBA both with the OPS experience to install, implement and support the architecture. 3. OPS has load-sharing properties so that is a definite advantage. 4. OPS software is an add-on and SW has to be purchased separately so another cost consideration.
Evaluating all pros and cons we decided to go for the Veritas HA
solution for Oracle. If you interested I can elaborate on the comparative
analysis.
Hope that helps.
.............. Ishrat Jehan
-----Original Message-----
From: root_at_fatcity.com [mailto:root_at_fatcity.com]On Behalf Of
jfedock_at_ixl.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2000 2:10 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: OPS questions
I am looking for some truthful information on OPS (Oracle Parallel Server).
Some questions I have are:
Anyone have any experiences to share?
Thanks....
John Fedock
iXL, Inc.
<mailto:jfedock_at_ixl.com> jfedock_at_ixl.com http://www.ixl.com <http://www.ixl.com>
-- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: INET: jfedock_at_ixl.com Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists -------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).Received on Tue Dec 26 2000 - 19:22:12 CST
![]() |
![]() |