Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: NetApp (was utl_file_dir)
But if we have active information in the rollback segment when the data=
base
crashed, Oracle will need those information to recover the database.
I thought Oracle use the rollback segments to rollback the transaction
which had not yet commited after the roll forward phrase. If you never =
back
up the RBS. You basically lose all of those information.
I really don't understand why they suggest to skip the RBS backup.
Winnie
Satar Naghshineh <Satar.Naghshineh_at_irvine.mellesgriot.com>@fatcity.com =
on
12/05/2000 01:45:40 PM
Please respond to ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com
Sent by: root_at_fatcity.com
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com> cc:
Subject: RE: NetApp (was utl_file_dir)
based on the following URL, they state that it is not necessary to back=
up
RBS.
http://www.netapp.com/tech_library/3049.html
Regards,
Satar
-----Original Message-----
From:=A0=A0 Winnie_Liu_at_infonet.com [SMTP:Winnie_Liu_at_infonet.com]
Sent:=A0=A0 Tuesday, December 05, 2000 12:55 AM
To:=A0=A0=A0=A0 Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject:=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 RE: NetApp (was utl_file_dir)
I will agree that both TEMP and INDEX are "easy" to rebuild. You sure that they don't require you to backup RBS? It is not easy t= o
rebuild it at all! :D
Winnie
Satar Naghshineh <Satar.Naghshineh_at_irvine.mellesgriot.com>@fatcity.c= om
on
12/04/2000 03:45:26 PM
Please respond to ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com
Sent by:=A0 root_at_fatcity.com
To:=A0=A0 Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com=
>
cc:
NetApp is suggesting that the DBA doesn't have to backup the RBS, TE= MP
and
INDEX tablespace. The "logic" behind that assumption is that one cou=
ld
easily re-create those tablespaces rather than backing them up
everytime.
The Snapshot utility is generally pushed/prostituted in business
environments (like in VLDB) in which backups must be fast and take u=
p
less
space.
Regards,
Satar
PS My suggestions/comments are the result of the voices of my head o= Received on Tue Dec 05 2000 - 16:39:03 CST
![]() |
![]() |