Re: Oracle Win NT Configuration Standards

From: Eric D. Pierce <PierceED_at_csus.edu>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 09:51:46 -0700
Message-Id: <10627.117680@fatcity.com>

THE OWNER OF THAT DOCUMENT ANNOUNCED THAT ANYONE USING THE LIST ADDRESS TO REQUEST IT WOULD BE *PUNISHED* (FOR VIOLATING NETIQUETTE) BY HAVING THEIR REQUEST IGNORED. ANYONE ELSE THAT NEEDS IT SHOULD SEND A "ME TOO" MESSAGE TO THE DOCUMENT OWNER, ***NOT*** THE LIST:

    sean.oneill_at_organon.ie 
    sean.oneill_at_organon.ie 
    sean.oneill_at_organon.ie 
    sean.oneill_at_organon.ie 
    sean.oneill_at_organon.ie 
    sean.oneill_at_organon.ie 
    sean.oneill_at_organon.ie 
    sean.oneill_at_organon.ie 
    sean.oneill_at_organon.ie 
    sean.oneill_at_organon.ie 
    sean.oneill_at_organon.ie 
    sean.oneill_at_organon.ie 
    sean.oneill_at_organon.ie

On 22 Sep 2000, at 7:10, Praveen Gautam wrote:

Date sent:      	Fri, 22 Sep 2000 07:10:50 -0800
To:             	Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com>
Send reply to:  	ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com
From:           	Praveen Gautam <gautam_at_pipeline.com>
Subject:        	Re: Oracle Win NT Configuration Standards

...
> Can I have a copy too???
Received on Fri Sep 22 2000 - 11:51:46 CDT