HP autoRaid Disk config?

From: Don Dealy II <dondealy_at_teleport.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 20:24:44 -0700
Message-Id: <10619.117049@fatcity.com>

--=====_96898828426962=_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The previous DBA/Unix Admin created 3 LUNs each 8G in size. There is one= file system on each LUN: Data is on 1, Index and Temp are on 2, with= everything else on 3. While i understand the idea of HP AutoRaid (scatter= over all the drives as RAID 0/1), is there any performance advantage by= creating a few more LUN / file systems and rearranging the various= tablespaces?
In the SUN / AIX world I often create a file system per tablespace type.= This makes it really easy to do a df -k or bdf and instantly see info= about disk usage.
Thx for your help.

--=====_96898828426962=_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>

<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.2106.6"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial" text=#000000>
The previous DBA/Unix Admin created 3 LUNs each 8G in size. There is one file
system on each LUN: Data is on 1, Index and Temp are on 2, with everything else on 3.  While i understand the idea of HP AutoRaid (scatter over all the drives as RAID 0/1), is there any performance advantage by creating a few more LUN / file systems and rearranging the various tablespaces?
In the SUN / AIX world I often create a file system per tablespace
type.  This makes it really easy to do a df -k or bdf and instantly see info about disk usage.
Thx for your help.</BODY></HTML>
Received on Thu Sep 14 2000 - 22:24:44 CDT