Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Is anyone doing replication on 7.3.4?
We have Read only Replication from 7.3.3.6 (Master Site on open vms) to =
8.1.5 (Slave Site Sun Solaris). Initial Setting was very tricky and =
painful. As mentioned there were numerous occasions when Fash refresh =
would fail for no apparent reason. =20
If the Master Site is down for maintenance / Backup, the SNP process keeps = trying and it never completes the refresh even when the Master site would = come up. There were times when the Snapshot tables in the Slave site = would be truncated. So we got rid of the SNP process and the refresh = groups. =20
We are using Cron Jobs to do the refresh by writing shell scripts three = times daily and it has been working great. Also one relevant issue that = the schema owner for the Master and Slave site should be exactly the = same.=20
Ramani
DBA
>>> <CHUCK_HAMILTON_at_qvc.com> 05/22/00 01:16PM >>>
My experience with replication was a couple of years ago with snapshots =
and
I wouldn't use it again. There were too many problems trying to keep the
snapshots in sync. Fast refresh snapshots were constantly getting out of
sync and thinking they needed a full refresh when such was not the case. =
If
I were doing it now, I'd create a standby database and open it in read =
only
mode. When you want to refresh it, put it back into recovery mode to sync
it with production, then put it back in read only mode.
As a side note, one of my colleagues recently went to a class that =
included
replication and the they (instructor included) were never able to get the
database to replicate properly even in a classroom setting. Doesn't sound
like it works any better now than 3 years ago when I tried it.
-- Chuck Hamilton QVC Inc. Enterprise Technical Services Oracle DBA =Received on Mon May 22 2000 - 14:39:01 CDT
=20
"Smith, Ron =
=20
L." To: Multiple recipients of = list ORACLE-L <ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com> =20 <rlsmith_at_kmg. cc: (bcc: CHUCK HAMILTON/QVC) =
=20
com> Subject: Is anyone doing = replication on 7.3.4? =20 Ext: NA =
=20
Sent by: =
=20
root_at_fatcity. =
=20
com =
=20
=
=20
=
=20
05/22/00 =
=20
09:58 AM =
=20
Please =
=20
respond to =
=20
ORACLE-L =
=20
=
=20
=
=20
I have been asked to look into creating a read only replicated database = for reporting purposes. Can anyone tell me if they have done this? I am interested if there is a performance hit when replication is implemented. How much time should I expect to dedicate to replication on a fairly large online production system? Is the replication software free? Has anyone used Quest's Shareplex? Thanks! Ron Smith Database Administration rlsmith_at_kmg.com=20 -- Author: Smith, Ron L. INET: rlsmith_at_kmg.com=20 Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists -------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). --=20 Author:=20 INET: CHUCK_HAMILTON_at_qvc.com=20 Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists -------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
![]() |
![]() |