Re: Re[2]: Oracle DBA opening in Englewood, CO

From: GenericOracleList <ORALIST_at_sswdserver.sswd.csus.edu>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 10:42:37 PST
Message-Id: <10501.105997@fatcity.com>

> Date sent: Thu, 18 May 2000 08:26:11 -0800
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com>
> From: dgoulet_at_vicr.com
> Subject: Re[2]: Oracle DBA opening in Englewood, CO

> ... In my book there is no
> substitute to good requirements definition and a clear understanding of those
> requirements by both parties before the first line of code is written.

DUH! if the users aren't required to sign off on the requirements, it is stupid to hold developers responsible, except that the developers are stupid for developing something that wasn't signed off on by the users (or maybe stupid for working in a place where the quality assurance protocols are weak/absent). Received on Thu May 18 2000 - 13:42:37 CDT