Re: Attribute-values in separate table
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 09:32:22 -0300
Message-ID: <46d80a09$0$4044$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
>
> Your solution creates a lot of similar tables, whereas mine groups all
> those tables into one.
> Creation of new attributes on the fly is done adding a record in my
> solution and creating a new table in yours.
> So my opinion is that my solution is preferable.
>
> But I'm open to all remarks!
>
> Anja.
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 09:32:22 -0300
Message-ID: <46d80a09$0$4044$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
anjasmedts_at_hotmail.com wrote:
>>Why not just have a "HasLock" relation with the id's of the furniture >>with locks? And a "HasWheels" relation with the id's of the furniture >>with wheels?- Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht niet weergeven -
>
> Your solution creates a lot of similar tables, whereas mine groups all
> those tables into one.
> Creation of new attributes on the fly is done adding a record in my
> solution and creating a new table in yours.
> So my opinion is that my solution is preferable.
>
> But I'm open to all remarks!
>
> Anja.
Why is it preferable? Are you allergic to tables? Received on Fri Aug 31 2007 - 14:32:22 CEST