Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?
From: Jan Hidders <hidders_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 04:20:22 -0700
Message-ID: <1186831222.448413.295160_at_57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com>
> I've tried to understand what you're saying here, but there's too much
> jargon (both in terms and in notation) involved for me. Most of what
> I've learned comes from practice, and what theory I did learn was for
> the most part in Dutch. Is there any chance that you repeat this
> argument in layman's terms for me, so that I have at least a chance of
> understanding it?
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 04:20:22 -0700
Message-ID: <1186831222.448413.295160_at_57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com>
On Aug 11, 1:52 am, Hugo Kornelis
<h..._at_perFact.REMOVETHIS.info.INVALID> wrote:
>
> I've tried to understand what you're saying here, but there's too much
> jargon (both in terms and in notation) involved for me. Most of what
> I've learned comes from practice, and what theory I did learn was for
> the most part in Dutch. Is there any chance that you repeat this
> argument in layman's terms for me, so that I have at least a chance of
> understanding it?
- Jan Hidders