Re: attribute name conflicts
From: Gene Wirchenko <genew_at_ocis.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 15:49:59 -0700
Message-ID: <l3ikb39fojvtpivtoek2ndc9qln6phn00l_at_4ax.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 15:49:59 -0700
Message-ID: <l3ikb39fojvtpivtoek2ndc9qln6phn00l_at_4ax.com>
Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>paul c wrote:
>
>> Doug_McMahon_at_yahoo.com wrote:
>> ... I suspect it is these
>>
>>> use cases that led Codd to distinguish attribute names, which
>>> are effectively member names with meaning only within the
>>> scope of a relation. ...
>>
>> The example I remember him giving was parts explosions.
>>
>> p
>
>I always did like a good exploding BOM.
Ah, the irony of "bomb" having a silent letter.
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:
I have preferences. You have biases. He/She has prejudices.Received on Thu Aug 09 2007 - 00:49:59 CEST