On May 30, 8:22 am, DA Morgan <damor..._at_psoug.org> wrote:
> euan.gar..._at_gmail.com wrote:
> > On May 27, 11:38 am, DA Morgan <damor..._at_psoug.org> wrote:
> >> euan.gar..._at_gmail.com wrote:
> >>> If I thought there was the slightest chance of you presenting an
> >>> appropriate balanced article with the data I would, but as thats not
> >>> going to happen I am not going to waste my time.
> >> My interpretation of your remark is that you made it up.
>
> >> Everyone else that has sent me a comment, when validated, has seen it
> >> posted with in 24 hours.
> >> --
> >> Daniel A. Morgan
> >> University of Washington
> >> damor..._at_x.washington.edu
> >> (replace x with u to respond)
> >> Puget Sound Oracle Users Groupwww.psoug.org
>
> > Oh come on Daniel if you are not willing to admit that you have shown
> > a historical bias in favour of Oracle and againstSQL Server, in many
> > cases directly in the face of the evidence presented to you, then you
> > really are wasting my time on this thread. Why not simply admit that
> > your view on the database world is coloured by your oracle experience,
> > its nothing to be ashamed off, it would just be better if you were
> > more open about it.
>
> I have a historical bias against Windows. I don't run production Oracle
> on Windows by choice. IfSQL Serverran on a decent operating system it
> might be a decent product.
>
> That said ... my website is an academic resource used by students at the
> University of Washington and the intention is to make it as complete and
> accurate as possible. And given that I teach in the Paul G. Allen
> Computing Center and the first class I ever taught at the U was in Mary
> Gates Hall it is not an environment where one can not be mindful of
> Microsoft's influence.
>
> Now are you capable of actually pointing to an error or omission or is
> the sole extent of what you have to offer complaining that I prefer
> scotch to brandy?
> --
> Daniel A. Morgan
> University of Washington
> damor..._at_x.washington.edu
> (replace x with u to respond)
> Puget Sound Oracle Users Groupwww.psoug.org- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
So are you saying that if SQL Server ran on a form of *nix that we
would no longer be subjected to your rants about Security, Clustering,
Locking, Escalation, Transaction Isolation Models, T-SQL, TempDb,
Schemas vs Instances vs Databases etc etc etc?
Received on Wed May 30 2007 - 18:49:58 CDT
