Re: More than one RAC instance/database on the same machine ?

From: DA Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu>
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 08:34:37 -0700
Message-ID: <1099150418.199937@yasure>

Howard J. Rogers wrote:

> DA Morgan wrote:
>
>

>>I answered the opposite way about the interconnect because I was
>>thinking that it is often the weakest link and would quickly bring the
>>entire thing to a screaching halt. Howard is correct that there is not
>>technical reason. We agree on that and we agree that it is completely
>>stupid to do so. Two agreements in a day so I'll stop there before he
>>thinks I'm toadying up again.
>>

>
>
> Sorry, but I don't agree it is "completely stupid", otherwise I wouldn't
> have wasted a week re-writing my Laptop RAC paper!
>
> For training, self-learning, and having a sniff of new(ish) technologies, it
> makes a lot of sense.
>
> Regards
> HJR
Howard ... I was quoting you.

You wrote the words "completely stupid" in the post to which I responded.

But thanks for setting me straight. ;-)

-- 
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with 'u' to respond)

Received on Sat Oct 30 2004 - 10:34:37 CDT