Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oracle 9i RAC vs Hardware clustering (like HACMP)

Re: Oracle 9i RAC vs Hardware clustering (like HACMP)

From: JEDIDIAH <jedi_at_nomad.mishnet>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:19:41 -0500
Message-ID: <slrncnqhac.6o8.jedi@nomad.mishnet>


On 2004-10-20, DA Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote:
> Mark Clark wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 21:14:38 -0700, DA Morgan
>> <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Praveen wrote:

[deletia]
>> Worth considering the limitations of RAC too -- range etc.. That said
>> h/w clustering and RAC are often complimentary in large scale
>> deployments where they each provide a solution to certain
>> problems/challenges. Certainly for large projects the aquisition
>> costs are rarely a major factor for a blue chip.
>>
>>
>> Mark
>> http://www.linxcel.co.uk
>
> What limitation? In Japan they ran a 10g RAC cluster with 128 nodes.
> Do you think you can find an SMP machine that large?

        Depending on the size of the indivual nodes, SGI probably makes such a machine already.

        Although, there is a difference between running and running well. The biggest production deployment I've ever heard of was 30 nodes. However, that's been awhile.

-- 
        Negligence will never equal intent, no matter how you 
attempt to distort reality to do so. This is what separates         ||| 
the real butchers from average Joes (or Fritzes) caught up in      / | \
events not in their control.


                                                     
Received on Mon Oct 25 2004 - 13:19:41 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US