Re: Enable 32K Block in 8K Block DB

"Daniel Morgan" <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote in message news:1080618879.842540_at_yasure...
> Howard J. Rogers wrote:
>
> > "Mike Ault" <mikerault_at_earthlink.net> wrote in message
> > news:37fab3ab.0403291707.6f43b737_at_posting.google.com...
> >
> >>Let's examine these allocations objectively shall we?
> >
> >
> > We can try for objectivity, but you'll have to leave your "We Love Mr
B."
> > button at the door.
>
> I would like to suggest that all concerned leave their "We Love" and
> "We Hate" at the door.
>
> This discussion could be very valuable if everyone stays professional
> and sticks to facts. Can we see benchmarks such that we can all test
> what each side of this debate posts and determine these matters on
> our own hardware and operating systems.
>
> Please lets not let this degenerate as it has in the past into
> name calling. Those of us watching and reading will draw our own
> conclusions and don't need to be spoon fed dirt.
>
> Thank you.

Why don't you actually let the discussion develop before leaping in?

I made no nasty comments about Mike. And I made no personal comments about B.

And I posted facts and figures to back up my point.

It is fine to not want things to degenerate. It is even fine to oh-so-quietly suggest, as my comment above to Mike was attempting to do, that a discussion on the technical merits is fine, but a blind defence (or attack) of Burleson is not.

It is not fine to pass judgement about the content of a thread before it has even begun in earnest. Especially when you then go on to snip the very technical content you say you are looking forward to reading.

Bide your time, I think.

HJR Received on Mon Mar 29 2004 - 22:02:46 CST