Re: physical standby WAIT_FOR_GAP

From: Li Li <litanli_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:09:03 -0600
Message-ID: <5f35c2320912221209h61d52dd9pbc9fd9ba1753891d_at_mail.gmail.com>



Hi, Jason,

We are using ASM on both primary and standby. so what I need to do is:

  1. backup current controlfile for standby on primary side
  2. copy the backup controlfile to standby side
  3. restore the controlfile on standby side

Is that what you did to resolve this issue?

Thank you very much for your time!
-Li

On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 1:46 PM, jason arneil <jason.arneil_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've seen this scenario occur quite a bit as well. I've seen creating
> a new standby controlfile from the primary can straighten things out.
>
>
> jason.
>
> --
> http://jarneil.wordpress.com
>
>
>
> 2009/12/22 Li Li <litanli_at_gmail.com>:
>> Greetings List,
>>
>> We have a physical standby running on a 4-node RAC. last night the
>> apply instance (instance 1) had ora-04031 error and data guard broker
>> changed the apply instance to be instance 2. Now apply instance
>> (instance 2) shows "WAIT_FOR_GAP" for a log sequence 5xxx, which is a
>> very old log, and has been applied a long time ago. Has any one seen
>> this before? How do I trick the apply instance to skip the logs that
>> have been applied already and start applying the logs that haven't
>> been received but haven't applied.
>>
>> Oracle version 10.2.0.3 on RHEL AS 4.7
>>
>> Thanks and hope you all a merry christmas and happy new year!
>> -Li
>> --
>> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>>
>>
>>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Tue Dec 22 2009 - 14:09:03 CST

Original text of this message