Re: ASM - Active Passive role

Hi Dan

I clustered ASM as well so the Failover time is shorter (just a bit).

Thanks

--
LSC


On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Dan Norris <dannorris_at_dannorris.com> wrote:



>  In your case, did you set up ASM as clustered so that all DGs were

> available on all ASM instances at all times and the single-instance

> databases just failed over? Or did you actually fail over the disk groups as

> well?

>

> Dan

>

> LS Cheng wrote:

>

> I have done it in a few customers without problems.

>

> Multipath is not provided by Sun Cluster, it depends on the Storage you use

> or you can use Sun Native MPXIO

>

> On 8/14/08, Stalin <stalinsk_at_gmail.com> wrote:

>>

>> Hi All,

>>

>> Anyone using ASM/clusterware on single databases in a active-passive

>> configuration. Most of our medium sized customer installations are

>> single databases in active-passive configuration using sun cluster

>> data services for automatic fail over. Wondering if we anyone using

>> ASM in this configuration successfully without the sun cluster part. I

>> believe you would still need sun cluster for multipathing as ASM

>> doesn't support it yet.

>>

>


--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l