RE: anyone else get told they have to wait 4 months for a bug fix?

From: Jesse, Rich <Rich.Jesse_at_quadtechworld.com>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 10:43:26 -0500
Message-ID: <FBE1FCA40ECAD41180400050DA2BC54004E939D0@qtiexch2.qgraph.com>

For some strange reason, I thought that 9.2.0.4 was terminal for 9iR2. = Or was it just "9.2.0"?

And yes, I can believe it. We had to wait for 8.1.7.4 to fix a major = CS=3DF bug in 8.1.7.2. But as others have said, it's probably better = this way. Look at it as an opportunity to have to test new versions so = much as to be cost-prohibitive to upgrade.

Rich

Rich Jesse                        System/Database Administrator
rich.jesse_at_quadtechworld.com      QuadTech, Sussex, WI USA

> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 9:56 AM
> Subject: anyone else get told they have to wait 4 months for=20
> a bug fix?

>=20
>=20

> This is in production... and we transport large tablespaces=20
> daily. Can you believe this? We will have serious=20
> interruptions in service.=20

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.

--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Mon May 24 2004 - 10:40:31 CDT