Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Oracle Compress Option
I think 9202 doesn't like to export compressed tables in direct mode ... so
watch out for that ... I implemented, tested and next day reverted back to
regular tables due to this export issue. Disk is cheap.
A BAARF party member wannabe !!
Raj
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 10:05 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
"Compress to impress?" by Julian Dyke is a good presentation on this topic (see for instance http://www.ukoug.org/calendar/jan03/jan30ab.htm).
I do have the article - 202 K with no compression, 147 K with compression :).
Let me know if you're interested, and I'll email it directly to you.
Mogens
Avnish.Rastogi_at_providence.org wrote:
>Does anybody has any experience with Oracle 9I compression option. I did
some test on 9202 with a table of more 14 million rows. Table has total 7
indexes. Surprising both table and indexes are using more space after
compression. Before compression space used is 13064MB and after compression
13184MB. In both the cases I did export from source table and stored in two
different tablespaces. Any insight on that and any disadvantages of using
that.
>
>Thanks
-- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Jamadagni, Rajendra INET: Rajendra.Jamadagni_at_espn.com Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services --------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).Received on Thu Sep 25 2003 - 08:04:46 CDT
- text/plain attachment: ESPN_Disclaimer.txt