| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
 |
 | |||
| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
|
| |||
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Renaming tablespace by updating SYS.TS$
We are doing this to make our transportable tablespace process simpler. We import the transported tablespace. Drop the old one. Rename the new one.
Anyone else do this? Any pitfuls other than the shock and awe of us touching TS$? I know its not supported.
For those of you who hate this idea, they've been doing it since before I got here. Just looking for outside opinions on this.
What if I don't have SQL in my pl/sql procedure? OP was trying to find why and where his code was looping. Where in pl/sql code there was wastage.
I have been using 10046 for a couple of years, I have done pl/sol for over 6 years, please show me how using 10046 you would find bad pl/sql when there is no single SQL statement in the code.
I am not doubting you, please educate me.
Raj
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at nospamespn dot com
All Views expressed in this email are strictly personal.
QOTD: Any clod can have facts, having an opinion is an art !
-----Original Message-----
From: Darrell Landrum [mailto:DLANDRUM@zalecorp.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2003 8:07 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: explain plans for PL/SQL and transactions
Sorry, but your statement that " for pl/sql you have no choice other
than dbms_profiler" is incorrect.
I have not challenged the usefulness of dbms_profiler. But I have now
been told twice that you can't use 10046 trace for pl/sql and if you
believe that you can't get useful information out of a 10046, level 8
trace for a pl/sql job then you are cheating yourself.
Let's look again at the original question.
For a batch job running pl/sql the user wanted to see:
-- the execution plans and costs for all the code it submits
I can't find the execution plans/costs using profiler. I could be in
for some education here, maybe it's there and I'm just not seeing it.
-- memory used
I can't find this using either tool.
-- cpu used
I can't find this in dbms_profiler output, but it is in 10046 trace.
-- time to complete.
Clearly available in both. However, a lot more detail of events
appears available in 10046.
I only continue to respond to this because I hate for someone who may
have never used either tool to get the idea that if tasked with
troubleshooting performance of a job that uses pl/sql they cannot use a
10046 trace. That would potentially be a huge part of a DBA's or a
developer's world in which they would be limiting themselves. Is it the
end all solution? Absolutely not. Is it going to help solve every
pl/sql or sql problem? Absolutely not. Is it, in general, a useful
tool to use with sql AND pl/sql? Absolutely!!
DL
-- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: <rgaffuri_at_cox.net INET: rgaffuri_at_cox.net Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services --------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).Received on Fri May 09 2003 - 09:32:12 CDT
 |
 |