(Win2K vs NT4) / RE: OT RE: Async I/O on Windows

Ross & Mark,
There are no major performance concerns here (and we get Oracle "free" {system wide educational site license} - unlike MS/SQL), so what I want to know is: does Oracle8 generally work well on Windows 2000 server (compared to running it on NT4)? We will be running on this hardware: IBM Netfinity5100 w/ RAID (dedicated Oracle server, w/ web server on same box, if possible).

My assumption is that Win2k/Oracle8 is "ok". Are there any horror stories out there about running Oracle8 on Win2K where running on NT4 would have been better?

thanks!
ep

On 5 Feb 2001, at 9:25, Mark Leith wrote:

Date sent:              Mon, 05 Feb 2001 09:25:25 -0800
To:                     Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com>

> RE: Async I/O on WindowsWOOOOHOOOOOOO a SQLServer vs. Oracle debate again!!

...

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Eric D. Pierce
  INET: PierceED_at_csus.edu

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).