Re: SQL Function call does not fail on no_data_found ?

From: Galen Boyer <galen_boyer_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:53:38 -0400
Message-ID: <utys5qi8t.fsf_at_www.yahoo.com>

John Hurley <hurleyjohnb_at_yahoo.com> writes:

> I would add that the SELECT INTO is a dangerous construct ... using a
> cursor is a better approach in PLSQL.

How is that true? PLSQL over SQL? When is that ever better?

-- 
Galen Boyer

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news_at_netfront.net ---

Received on Wed Mar 24 2010 - 20:53:38 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Galen Boyer: "Re: Can a procedure contain only a SELECT statement?"
Previous message: Galen Boyer: "Re: SQL Function call does not fail on no_data_found ?"
Maybe in reply to: webtourist: "SQL Function call does not fail on no_data_found ?"
Next in thread: ddf: "Re: SQL Function call does not fail on no_data_found ?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message