Re: Comparisons Oracle 11.1.0.7 to Oracle 10.2.0.4
From: joel garry <joel-garry_at_home.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:55:26 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <f627ce99-0452-4db5-8bca-170fc1932f60_at_w37g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
On Oct 22, 2:37 am, "Arne Ortlinghaus" <Arne.Ortlingh..._at_acs.it> wrote:
> I have made some performance comparison tests on test computers and it has
> turned out that the Oracle 11 databases are in general slower compared to
> the Oracle 10 databases by 10 to 30%. The databases are running on Windows
> Vista and Windows 2003 64 Bit. We hope that the release 2 of Oracle 11 gives
> some enhancements because in general there are not many advantages regarding
> new features useable for us.
>
> Has someone made similar comparison results?
>
> Arne Ortlinghaus
> ACS Data Systems
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:55:26 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <f627ce99-0452-4db5-8bca-170fc1932f60_at_w37g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
On Oct 22, 2:37 am, "Arne Ortlinghaus" <Arne.Ortlingh..._at_acs.it> wrote:
> I have made some performance comparison tests on test computers and it has
> turned out that the Oracle 11 databases are in general slower compared to
> the Oracle 10 databases by 10 to 30%. The databases are running on Windows
> Vista and Windows 2003 64 Bit. We hope that the release 2 of Oracle 11 gives
> some enhancements because in general there are not many advantages regarding
> new features useable for us.
>
> Has someone made similar comparison results?
>
> Arne Ortlinghaus
> ACS Data Systems
See http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/bi/db/11g/pdf/twp_sql_plan_management_11gr2.pdf
jg
-- _at_home.com is bogus. http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stories/2009/oct/17/hedge-fund-billionaire-indicted-stock-fraud/?uniontribReceived on Thu Oct 22 2009 - 12:55:26 CDT