Re: varchar2(size)
From: John Hurley <johnbhurley_at_sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 05:46:34 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <d16ec322-7e0f-4071-94bb-10d468920277_at_k33g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
On Sep 30, 7:35 pm, indytoatl <indyto..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 05:46:34 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <d16ec322-7e0f-4071-94bb-10d468920277_at_k33g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
On Sep 30, 7:35 pm, indytoatl <indyto..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
snip
> Thanks for the responses. I just wanted to be sure that the varchar
> size didn't have
> anything to do with SGA or buffer memory. So, you have comfirmed that
> there is no
> performance issues with different settings.
> with memory allocation within the SGA.
Ummm ... now you have really lost me even more than before. Received on Thu Oct 01 2009 - 07:46:34 CDT