Re: create database fatal error
From: Tommy Halsbrekk <tommy_at_dummy.no>
Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2008 19:49:35 +0100
Message-ID: <g4r0j8$f76$1@aioe.org>
>
> Now that really puzzles me. I would imagine you would only need to do it a
> couple of times. Once for each major release. You could even do a quick
> diff on each major release and find it doesn't change much. (yes, the
> contents of catproc etc. might change, but that isn't what you diff, just
> the outer process.)
>
> I don't understand the business need to reverse engineer this.
Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2008 19:49:35 +0100
Message-ID: <g4r0j8$f76$1@aioe.org>
gym dot scuba dot kennedy at gmail wrote:
> "Tommy Halsbrekk" <tommy_at_dummy.no> wrote in message
> news:g4qr2s$q9c$1_at_aioe.org...
>> gym dot scuba dot kennedy at gmail wrote: >> >>> You know you can run dbca and have dbca create the scripts for you. Then >>> if you really want to build it yourself you can do it from that. You can >>> reverse engineer the scripts from the scripts that are produced. >> Yes I know, but I cant start over with this task every time I find there >> is a better way of doing it. But, thanks anyway. >> >> regards >> >> tommy
>
> Now that really puzzles me. I would imagine you would only need to do it a
> couple of times. Once for each major release. You could even do a quick
> diff on each major release and find it doesn't change much. (yes, the
> contents of catproc etc. might change, but that isn't what you diff, just
> the outer process.)
>
> I don't understand the business need to reverse engineer this.
I am not reverse engineering this, I just had a problem with my CREATE DATABASE statement and I did not understand why.
> I get the
> impression that you are in a big hurry. The irony is that if you went a
> little slower and did less you would achive a better result with less
> overall effort.
I am completely aware of that.
I tried looking at the dbca scripts, but they were too advanced.
regards
tommy Received on Sun Jul 06 2008 - 13:49:35 CDT