Re: Pros/cons of using as many table partitions as possible
From: Noons <wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 23:35:31 +1000
Message-ID: <fufgr3$jr4$1@registered.motzarella.org>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 23:35:31 +1000
Message-ID: <fufgr3$jr4$1@registered.motzarella.org>
Jonathan Lewis wrote,on my timestamp of 20/04/2008 4:38 PM:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Noons" <wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au>
> Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
> Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2008 4:15 PM
> Subject: Re: Pros/cons of using as many table partitions as possible
>
>
>> Jonathan mentioned here a few years ago >> about using thousands of partitions >> in a table without any major problems.>
>
> I'm not sure that I did - possibly around a couple of
> thousand, like one partition per day for 7 years of
> data, and then be careful about the number of (local)
> indexes.
I think it was during your partition testing.
Got a bell going in my mind about that.
I think the OP wants to eliminate the
need for indexing via partitioning, that
would stop bugs with local indexes
from showing up?
Received on Sun Apr 20 2008 - 08:35:31 CDT