Re: Incremental Commits and Disappearing Sessions

From: gazzag <gareth_at_jamms.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 07:52:56 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <5070f73f-e377-476e-bea2-fa2740bcbbde@s37g2000prg.googlegroups.com>


On 26 Feb, 00:54, "Dereck L. Dietz" <diet..._at_ameritech.net> wrote:
> Oracle 10.2.0.3.0
> Windows 2003 Server
> 16GB Memory (93% SGA( 93% Buffer Cache,<3% Shared Pool, <3% Large Pool), 7%
> PGA)
>
> In my continuing saga of disappearing sessions our off-site DBA has told us
> to do incremental commits.

Is your DBA on drugs?

> It's always been my understanding that you only want to commit at the end of
> your logical transaction.  After reading Tom Kyte's book that only
> reinforced that understanding.
>
> Could anybody shed any light on why he would suggest this?

No idea. Ask him his reasons. I'd love to see them.

HTH -g Received on Tue Feb 26 2008 - 09:52:56 CST

Original text of this message