Re: Why is VARCHAR2(4000) bad ?

From: DA Morgan <damorgan_at_psoug.org>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 16:07:39 -0800
Message-ID: <1202170033.529682@bubbleator.drizzle.com>

Andrew M wrote:

> Again, it has nothing to do with the length of the column in the
> table, but the choice of the bind variable length.
>
> Andrew

Read what JMoo wrote: Yes it does!

-- 
Daniel A. Morgan
Oracle Ace Director & Instructor
University of Washington
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Group
www.psoug.org

Received on Mon Feb 04 2008 - 18:07:39 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Vince: "Re: Outer join in database link query to Sybase"
Previous message: DA Morgan: "Re: Problem with Oracle standby database (automatic transfer of archived logs)"
Next in thread: Andrew M: "Re: Why is VARCHAR2(4000) bad ?"
Reply: Andrew M: "Re: Why is VARCHAR2(4000) bad ?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message