Re: RAC cache fusion details

From: Jerome Vitalis <vitalis..._at_gmail.com>
Date: 19 Dec 2007 08:49:21 GMT
Message-ID: <4768db11$0$5431$426a74cc@news.free.fr>

DA Morgan wrote:

> This was not intended for you. I was responding to the statement in the
> thread:
> "This pertains to 9iR2, but I doubt 10g will treat this differently."

I see the difference in meaning now. Thanks.

---

échangez opinions et commentaires dans les forums de discussion. http://www.usenetgratuit.com/ Received on Wed Dec 19 2007 - 02:49:21 CST