Re: Cache Hit Ratio from system views

<sybrandb_at_hccnet.nl> wrote in message
news:30p7c39h7e4nj7t1b9bnl5o0589u1upm8l_at_4ax.com...
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 03:42:16 GMT, "Bob Jones" <email_at_me.not> wrote:
>
>>>> I clearly disagree with the statement that BHCR is meaningless. This
>>>> has
>>>> been discussed several times before. I won't waste any more energy.
>>>
>>> Disagree all you wish Connor proved this clearly and decisively many
>>> years ago. And it should come as no surprise that Connor is one of the
>>> most capable, and respected, Oracle technologists on the planet for a
>>> reason.
>>>
>>
>>I do not know who this Connor guy is. Did he really say BHCR is
>>meaningless?
>>I would love to see his proof.
>
> This 'Connor guy' (a label intended as disrespectful) is Connor Mc
> Donald, a member of the OakTable Network. His site is
> http://www.oracledba.co.uk. The proof is on this site including a
> demonstration.
>>
>>I think the burden is on you to prove BHCR is meaningless. Maybe the issue
>>here is reading too many books and articles.
>>
> I think the burden is on you to prove it is meaningfull and to
> contradict the figures provided by Connor McDonald.
> I think the issue here is you have read to many fairy tales composed
> by Donald K Burleson, Mike R Ault, and other Rampant authours.
> May be you get paid by Burleson to bash 'savy professionals'.
> But most likely you are someone who like Burleson's 'savy
> proefessionals' just doesn't know what he is talking about.
> I would love to see your apologize here once you have read the article
> on www.oracledba.co.uk, but I'm not holding my breath: you have
> established yourself here as an arrogant incompetent troll.
>

Do I really need to respond to this moron? Received on Thu Aug 16 2007 - 20:37:27 CDT