Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: EXP Parameters to take backup of 110 GB database
ยท sybrandb_at_hccnet.nl <sybrandb_at_hccnet.nl>:
> On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 13:58:21 +0200, Alexander Skwar
> <alexander_at_skwar.name> wrote:
>
>>Why do you do that? Want to cover, that you don't have arguments? >> >>Alexander Skwar
Wrong. How could I've shown the breakage, without having used it?
If you mean that I did not yet use RMAN in production: You're right. The current solution works very well and there's hardly a benefit, if I would use RMAN. That's so, because of the unique (?) scenario I've got to deal with. If I just would need to backup Oracle, then RMAN would of course the way to go.
As far as I'm concerned, I'm only changing something, if there's a benefit. A perceived benefit. If you're different: Fine. Don't expect that anyone agrees, that changing such a basic thing just for the heck of it, is a good thing. It's not. Proven, reliable solutions are king. But that's just the difference between you and me.
> without actually reading the documentatiojn,
Wrong as well, as you very well know. How should I have read the docs to you, without having read it? I'm referring to the thread where you "helped" and I responded that what you wrote is not covered by the docs (the controlfile thing).
> without even
> trying out the workarounds presented to you,
And wrong again. As I've shown.
> without acknowledging you
> were, IIRC, not on the last release,
Man - can you get at least *one* thing right? I posted the version I was using. And anyone knows, that 9.2.0.4 is not the latest on Solaris.
> which might help you out, etc,
> etc, etc.
Yep. "etc., etc., etc.". More of the same bullshit from you.
> So, IMO, actually you decided even before you started trying out RMAN,
> that is was not going to work.
Surprise: You're wrong again.
> This is the typical 'Not invented here'
> syndrome: I don't know how to use it, I don't want to *learn* how to
> use it: RMAN doesn't work for me.
I don't want to repeat myself, but you leave no choice: You're wrong.
> Instead of accepting a workaround, or upgrading, or submitting a
> Service Request,
How do you submit a SR, if you don't have support? And if you think you know that I didn't try to get in contact with Oracle: You're wrong again.
> you started riding a hobby horse, and you started
> flaming everyone who demonstrates RMAN actually does work.
Wrong.
> You are a typical example of the 'I know everything better'
> administrator,
I'm not like you.
> who didn't update his knowledge for years and has
> become a dinosaur, or worse:
> The combination of your lack of knowledge, and your arrogant attitude
I only deal arrogantly with you and Daniel, as both of you are such extremely arrogant persons.
> makes you an excellent example of a troll.
Says the troll.
> So, rest assured, as soon as you chime in 'RMAN doesn't work' which is
> just plain utter nonsense,as it does work for thousands of people,
I showed to you, that RMAN doesn't work.
> except for a troll called 'Alexander Skwar', I will continue to flame
> you.
Ah, so you actually admit to flame? That makes you the troll here, you know?
> You deserve no better, until you limit your baseless allegations to
> 'Regrettably RMAN didn't work for me'
Which is, what I've always done. I was of course always and ever just speaking for me. But don't let facts disturb your imagination.
> But better still of course you better get lost completely.
I think the same of you.
Alexander Skwar
-- Save gas, don't use the shell.Received on Thu Aug 09 2007 - 01:10:19 CDT
![]() |
![]() |